Impact on Royalties and Copyright<\/strong><\/h2>\nThese manipulated versions are considered music fraud<\/strong>, potentially diverting millions of dollars from the rightful copyright owners in royalties. This misattribution and misappropriation of music tracks mean that many artists are not receiving fair compensation for their work. Pex CEO Rasty Turek highlighted that at least 1% of all music features some modified audio, often undetected by existing systems\u200b\u200b\u200b.<\/p>\nPlatform Responsibility and Future Measures<\/strong><\/h2>\nTurek argues that the responsibility for this issue starts with the platforms themselves. If platforms like Spotify enforce stricter requirements for content verification, distributors will likely adjust their processes to comply. There’s a need to balance satisfying audience desires<\/strong> for modified content and ensuring proper attribution and remuneration for artists. Turek suggests a win-win approach where legitimate content is available but with correct attribution and compensation for the original creators\u200b.<\/p>\nCultural Phenomena and Trending Modifications<\/strong><\/h2>\nManipulated audio tracks have become a cultural phenomenon<\/strong>, with sped-up and slowed-down versions becoming increasingly popular. This trend is driven by fandom and the ease of modifying content using available tools. It points to a potential future where a significant portion of streaming content could be in some form of modified state. As the music industry continues to grow, there’s a risk that a substantial amount of revenue could be redirected from legitimate artists to others through these modifications\u200b.<\/p>\nThe discovery of over 1 million manipulated tracks on streaming platforms has shed light on a significant issue within the music industry<\/strong>. Platforms and distributors must take responsibility for the content they host and ensure proper attribution and compensation for artists. As this trend of modified content grows, it’s crucial for the industry to adapt and find ways to satisfy both the audience’s desires and the artists’ rights. The challenge lies in balancing the demand for modified content with the need for fair and transparent royalty distribution\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":10028,"featured_media":169701,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[398],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-169700","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-music"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/culture.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/169700"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/culture.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/culture.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/culture.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10028"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/culture.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=169700"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/culture.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/169700\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/culture.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/169701"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/culture.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=169700"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/culture.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=169700"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/culture.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=169700"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}